The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct

Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct are closely matched at -4.8 and -4.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -4.8 and -4.3.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2 7B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen2 7B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-4.8
#341
-4.3
#336
-5.2
#333
-4.0
#327
-11.0
#256
1.0
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 2 9B
Qwen2 7B Instruct
-3.4#305
-1.1#294
0.4#175
-3.1#183
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 9B · 14 for Qwen2 7B Instruct

5 shared

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP).

Qwen2 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.6B diff

Gemma 2 9B has 1.6B more parameters than Qwen2 7B Instruct, making it 21.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B
7.6B
Qwen2 7B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Qwen2 7B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Qwen2 7B Instruct is 1 month newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 9B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -4.8 and -4.3. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Qwen2 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Qwen2 7B Instruct scores MT-Bench: 84.1%, GSM8k: 82.3%, HumanEval: 79.9%, C-Eval: 77.2%, AlignBench: 72.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.8 vs -4.3), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.