The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.4 to -4.8.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.4 to -4.8, ranking #186 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.4 and ranks #186 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-4.8
#342
20.4
#186
-5.2
#334
19.4
#190
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 2 9B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
-3.4#305
19.7#156
0.4#175
21.0#62
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 9B · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.8B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 23.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 257.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 15 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 9B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.4 to -4.8. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.8 vs 20.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.