The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 12B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched at 5.6 and 1.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.6 and 1.9.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 3 12B wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 12B

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.6
#295
1.9
#318
5.9
#289
1.4
#311
2.8
#222
-3.8
#254
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
6 of 7
1 of 7
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 12B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
12.9#229
4.3#284
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 12B · 31 for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

7 shared

Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 6 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MBPP).

Gemma 3 12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

48.0B diff

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has 48.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 12B, making it 400.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 12B
12.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
12.0B
Gemma 3 12B
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 12B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 12B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

Gemma 3 12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

Gemma 3 12B is 7 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 12B
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 5.6 and 1.9. Gemma 3 12B is made by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 12B compare to Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.6 vs 1.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 12B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft.