The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched at 5.6 and 3.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.6 and 3.8.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 12B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.6
#303
3.8
#314
5.9
#297
3.3
#309
2.8
#230
3.9
#222
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 6
4 of 6
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
12.9#231
10.6#251
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 12B · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

6 shared

Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.7B diff

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 2.7B more parameters than Gemma 3 12B, making it 22.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 12B
12.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
12.0B
Gemma 3 12B
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 12B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 12B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3 12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3 12B is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.6 years ago

5mo newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 12B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 5.6 and 3.8. Gemma 3 12B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 12B compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.6 vs 3.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.