Model Comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MathVista-Mini, TextVQA).
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 3 12B has 3.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 44.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemma 3 12B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 12B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.
Gemma 3 12B is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.
Mar 12, 2025
1.2 years ago
1mo newerJan 26, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 3 12B
View detailsQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.