Model Comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Grok Code Fast 1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemma 3 1B vs Grok Code Fast 1 — which is better?

Gemma 3 1B (by Google) and Grok Code Fast 1 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies output context (10,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 1B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Grok Code Fast 1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok Code Fast 1 is 6 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.3 years ago

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

10 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
Grok Code Fast 1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 1B
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemma 3 1B (Google) and Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemma 3 1B supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons