The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 1B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Comparing Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
128,000
Released
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
License
Gemma
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.0B diff

Mistral NeMo Instruct has 11.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 1100.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 1B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Gemma 3 1B is 8 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

7mo newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemma 3 1B (Google) and Mistral NeMo Instruct (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to Mistral NeMo Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemma 3 1B supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.