Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4Which is better in 2026?

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is 48.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4 — which is better?

Gemma 3 27B (by Google) and Grok-4 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench). Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 48.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok-4 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 48.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-4 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 30.0x cheaper than Grok-4 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.20/1M tokens) is 75.0x cheaper than Grok-4 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4 is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
xAI
Grok-4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 27B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-4 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Grok-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.

Grok-4 is 4 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

1.0 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 27B

Grok-4

Dec 2024

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Grok-4 is available from xAI.

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

Grok-4

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (87.5% vs 42.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.0% vs 29.7%)
GoogleGemma 3 27B
xAIGrok-4

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Grok-4
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
xAI
Grok-4

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4?

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Grok-4 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Grok-4 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%.

Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than Grok-4?

Gemma 3 27B is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra. Grok-4 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Grok-4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $3.00/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Grok-4 is developed by xAI.