Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Magistral MediumWhich is better in 2026?

Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs Magistral Medium — which is better?

Gemma 3 27B (by Google) and Magistral Medium (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Magistral Medium is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench). Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output

Choose Magistral Medium if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Magistral Medium is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.0B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 3.0B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 12.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
24.0B
Magistral Medium

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

Magistral Medium is 3 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.1 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 27B

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (70.8% vs 42.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (50.3% vs 29.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Magistral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Magistral Medium
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Magistral Medium?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Magistral Medium?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.