The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 8.3. Gemma 3 27B is 1.8x cheaper per token.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 8.3, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3 27B
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
8.3
#283
45.6
#29
Reasoning
8.6
#274
42.5
#45
Coding
5.3
#202
36.7
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.08 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$0.16 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
131,072
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Gemma 3 27B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.08/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 27B ($0.16/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.16
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

282.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 282.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 1044.4% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 19 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.16/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 8.3. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3 27B is 1.8x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08/M input and $0.16/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.3 vs 45.6), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.08 vs $0.14/M), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons