The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct

Gemma 3 27B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.3 to -4.5.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 27B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.3 to -4.5, ranking #280 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 3 27B wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.3 and ranks #280 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.3
#280
-4.5
#348
8.6
#271
-4.2
#341
5.3
#199
0.9
#236
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 7
0 of 7
Input price
$0.08 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.16 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 27B
Qwen2 7B Instruct
17.4#195
-1.5#303
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

27 reported for Gemma 3 27B · 14 for Qwen2 7B Instruct

7 shared

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.4B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 19.4B more parameters than Qwen2 7B Instruct, making it 254.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
7.6B
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2 7B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2 7B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Gemma 3 27B is 8 months newer than Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

7mo newer
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.3 to -4.5. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Qwen2 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Qwen2 7B Instruct scores MT-Bench: 84.1%, GSM8k: 82.3%, HumanEval: 79.9%, C-Eval: 77.2%, AlignBench: 72.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.3 vs -4.5), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.