Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2 7B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3 27B (by Google) and Qwen2 7B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2 7B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.4B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 19.4B more parameters than Qwen2 7B Instruct, making it 254.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
7.6B
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2 7B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2 7B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Gemma 3 27B is 8 months newer than Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

7mo newer
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (42.4% vs 25.3%)
Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 82.3%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.8% vs 79.9%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (29.7% vs 26.6%)
Higher MATH score (89.0% vs 49.6%)
Higher MBPP score (74.4% vs 67.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (67.5% vs 44.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Qwen2 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Qwen2 7B Instruct scores MT-Bench: 84.1%, GSM8k: 82.3%, HumanEval: 79.9%, C-Eval: 77.2%, AlignBench: 72.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Qwen2 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.