The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MathVista-Mini, TextVQA). Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Mar 2025
Jan 2025
License
Gemma
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MathVista-Mini, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.7B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 18.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 225.7% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Gemma 3 27B is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.