The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Mar 2025
Aug 2026
License
Gemma
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

98.0B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 98.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 363.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.