The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs Grok-4.1 Thinking

Grok-4.1 Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 15.9 to -1.8. Gemma 3 4B is 240.0x cheaper per token.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4.1 Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.9 to -1.8, ranking #216 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 240.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok-4.1 Thinking also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • cost matters — it's about 240.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-4.1 Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.9 and ranks #216 on LLM Stats
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.8
#335
15.9
#216
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.02 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
131,072
256,000

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 4B · 11 for Grok-4.1 Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 150.0x cheaper than Grok-4.1 Thinking ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 375.0x cheaper than Grok-4.1 Thinking ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4.1 Thinking is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
xAI
Grok-4.1 Thinking
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4.1 Thinking accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 4B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-4.1 Thinking is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
xAI
Grok-4.1 Thinking
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4.1 Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Grok-4.1 Thinking uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Grok-4.1 Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Grok-4.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-17.

Grok-4.1 Thinking is 8 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Grok-4.1 Thinking

Nov 17, 2025

9 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Grok-4.1 Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4.1 Thinking's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Grok-4.1 Thinking

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. Grok-4.1 Thinking is available from xAI.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

Grok-4.1 Thinking

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
Grok-4.1 Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Grok-4.1 Thinking.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Grok-4.1 Thinking?

Grok-4.1 Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 15.9 to -1.8. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Grok-4.1 Thinking is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Grok-4.1 Thinking in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Grok-4.1 Thinking scores Creative Writing v3: 86.1%, WMDP: 84.0%, EQ-Bench: 79.3%, ProtocolQA: 79.0%, LMArena Text Leaderboard: 74.2%.

Is Gemma 3 4B cheaper than Grok-4.1 Thinking?

Gemma 3 4B is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. Grok-4.1 Thinking costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinking?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Grok-4.1 Thinking supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.8 vs 15.9), context window (131K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.02 vs $3.00/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Grok-4.1 Thinking?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Grok-4.1 Thinking is developed by xAI.