The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched at -1.9 and 1.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -1.9 and 1.9.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 7 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.9
#337
1.9
#318
-2.9
#334
1.4
#311
-4.4
#255
-3.8
#254
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 7
4 of 7
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 4B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
5.0#275
4.3#284
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 4B · 31 for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

7 shared

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH), while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

56.0B diff

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has 56.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 1400.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

Gemma 3 4B is 7 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -1.9 and 1.9. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.9 vs 1.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft.