The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -1.9.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -1.9, ranking #299 overall.

In the 10 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 5.2 and ranks #299 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 10 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.9
#337
5.2
#299
-2.9
#334
1.4
#312
-4.4
#255
1.1
#235
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 10
8 of 10
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3 4B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
5.0#275
5.0#273
-11.8#207
5.2#152
-9.5#167
6.7#131
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 4B · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

10 shared

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MATH), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 7 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, DocVQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.0B diff

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has 3.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 75.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 1 month newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.5 years ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -1.9. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.9 vs 5.2), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.