The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.2 to -9.6.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score -5.2 to -9.6, ranking #356 overall.

In the 28 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview wins 26; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores -5.2 and ranks #356 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 26 of 28 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.6
#365
-5.2
#356
Reasoning
-9.8
#358
-5.9
#351
Coding
-4.4
#256
-0.1
#241
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 28
26 of 28
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Math
-6.4#322
-1.3#302
Finance
-9.6#224
-4.3#212
Legal
-9.6#207
-4.3#196
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

28 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 2 benchmarks (ECLeKTic, GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 25 benchmarks (AIME 2025, ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, Codegolf v2.2, DROP, Global-MMLU, Global-MMLU-Lite, HellaSwag, HiddenMath, HumanEval, Include, LiveCodeBench v5, MBPP, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande, WMT24++).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Gemma.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-05-20.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.2 to -9.6. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.6 vs -5.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons