Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-4.1Which is better in 2026?

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-4.1 — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) and GPT-4.1 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4.1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU). GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4.1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU).

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4.1 specifies input context (1,047,576 tokens). Only GPT-4.1 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-4.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while GPT-4.1 was released on 2025-04-14.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 1 month newer than GPT-4.1.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer
GPT-4.1

Apr 14, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

GPT-4.1

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (46.4% vs 6.7%)
Higher GPQA score (66.3% vs 24.8%)
Higher MMLU score (90.2% vs 60.1%)
GoogleGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
OpenAIGPT-4.1
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-4.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
GPT-4.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
OpenAI
GPT-4.1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-4.1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and GPT-4.1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to GPT-4.1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. GPT-4.1 scores MMLU: 90.2%, CharXiv-D: 87.9%, IFEval: 87.4%, MMMLU: 87.3%, MMMU: 74.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-4.1?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-4.1?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-4.1?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons