The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 60.7 to -9.4.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Astra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 60.7 to -9.4, ranking #1 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-6 Astra wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-6 Astra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 60.7 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
60.7
#1
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
58.7
#1
Coding
-4.3
#247
49.0
#1
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$10.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$50.00 / M
Context window
—
1,050,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
GPT-6 Astra
Math
-6.0#312
35.3#42
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 22 for GPT-6 Astra

1 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-6 Astra is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

GPT-6 Astra significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Astra specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Astra specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-6 Astra support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Astra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-6 Astra uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while GPT-6 Astra was released on 2026-09-04.

GPT-6 Astra is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

GPT-6 Astra

Sep 4, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while GPT-6 Astra has a cutoff of 2026-04-30.

GPT-6 Astra has more recent training data (up to 2026-04-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

GPT-6 Astra

Apr 2026

1.8 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-6 Astra side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Astra
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-6 Astra.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 60.7 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and GPT-6 Astra is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to GPT-6 Astra in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. GPT-6 Astra scores ExploitBench: 100.0%, ARC-AGI-3: 99.9%, ARC-AGI: 98.5%, FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 97.6%, GPQA: 96.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-6 Astra?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-6 Astra supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-6 Astra?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs 60.7), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and GPT-6 Astra?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and GPT-6 Astra is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons