The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.3 to -9.4.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score -5.3 to -9.4, ranking #346 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores -5.3 and ranks #346 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
-5.3
#346
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
-5.3
#335
Coding
-4.3
#247
3.0
#212
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Math
-6.0#312
-5.4#309
Finance
-9.2#214
-3.3#198
Legal
-9.2#198
-3.3#184
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

4 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DROP), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, HumanEval, MMLU).

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.1B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 5.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 266.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 1 month newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

2w newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.3 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs -5.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons