The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Grok Code Fast 1

Grok Code Fast 1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.7 to -9.6.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok Code Fast 1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.7 to -9.6, ranking #195 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.7 and ranks #195 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.6
#368
20.7
#195
Reasoning
-9.8
#361
20.6
#188
Coding
-4.4
#259
12.9
#143
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 1 for Grok Code Fast 1

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Grok Code Fast 1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok Code Fast 1 specifies output context (10,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Code Fast 1 does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok Code Fast 1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Grok Code Fast 1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok Code Fast 1 is 3 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok Code Fast 1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok Code Fast 1's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Grok Code Fast 1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Grok Code Fast 1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
Grok Code Fast 1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Grok Code Fast 1?

Grok Code Fast 1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.7 to -9.6. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Grok Code Fast 1 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.6 vs 20.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Grok Code Fast 1?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons