Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Pixtral-12BWhich is better in 2026?

Pixtral-12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Pixtral-12B — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) and Pixtral-12B (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Pixtral-12B is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MMLU). Pixtral-12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Pixtral-12B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Pixtral-12B is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MMLU).

Pixtral-12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.5B diff

Pixtral-12B has 10.5B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 549.2% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
12.4Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
12.4B
Pixtral-12B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Pixtral-12B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Pixtral-12B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Pixtral-12B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Pixtral-12B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 8 months newer than Pixtral-12B.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer
Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Pixtral-12B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Pixtral-12B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Pixtral-12B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Mistral AI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher HumanEval score (72.0% vs 66.5%)
Higher MMLU score (69.2% vs 60.1%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Pixtral-12B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
Pixtral-12B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Pixtral-12B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Pixtral-12B?

Pixtral-12B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Pixtral-12B is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Pixtral-12B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Pixtral-12B?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Pixtral-12B?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Pixtral-12B?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons