Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 7 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU, Winogrande).

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.1B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct has 5.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 266.5% larger.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

1.9Bparameters

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

7.0Bparameters

1.9B

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

7.0B

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

12 months ago

8mo newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

View details

Google

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher MMLU-Pro score (40.5% vs 40.1%)

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher ARC-C score (60.9% vs 51.7%)

Higher HellaSwag score (76.8% vs 72.2%)

Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 66.5%)

Higher LiveCodeBench score (18.2% vs 13.2%)

Higher MBPP score (83.5% vs 56.6%)

Higher MMLU score (67.6% vs 60.1%)

Higher Winogrande score (72.9% vs 66.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)	Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.