The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -11.1.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -11.1, ranking #12 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.6 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Google
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-11.1
#394
52.6
#12
Reasoning
-11.4
#386
41.2
#62
Coding
-4.6
#282
41.4
#9
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Muse Wonder Full

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -11.1. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-11.1 vs 52.6). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Muse Wonder Full?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons