Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score -3.5 to -10.9.
Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score -3.5 to -10.9, ranking #367 overall.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
- overall performance matters — it scores -3.5 and ranks #367 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU).
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has 1.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 14.3% larger.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 9 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.
Jun 26, 2025
1.3 years ago
9mo newerSep 19, 2024
2.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.
Jun 2024
—
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.
Related comparisons
More Gemma 3n E2B Instructed comparisons
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Muse Spark Open
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
More Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct comparisons
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Muse Spark Open
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)