The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.5 to -10.1.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 2.5 to -10.1, ranking #313 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 2.5 and ranks #313 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-10.1
#364
2.5
#313
Reasoning
-10.3
#357
2.9
#302
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Math
-6.3#319
2.7#288
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E2B · 14 for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

2 shared

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, DROP).

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Gemma 3n E2B is 2 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a cutoff of 2024-04-01.

Gemma 3n E2B has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct (2024-04-01).

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

2 mo newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 2.5 to -10.1. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.1 vs 2.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons