Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Magistral Medium

Comparing Gemma 3n E2B and Magistral Medium across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E2B and Magistral Medium don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

16.0B diff

Magistral Medium has 16.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 200.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
24.0B
Magistral Medium

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

Gemma 3n E2B is 1 month newer than Magistral Medium.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

2w newer
Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Magistral Medium has a cutoff of 2025-06-01.

Magistral Medium has more recent training data (up to 2025-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

1 yr newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Mistral AI
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Magistral Medium?

Gemma 3n E2B (Google) and Magistral Medium (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B and Magistral Medium?

Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.