Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4Which is better in 2026?

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4 — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) and GPT-4 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while GPT-4 is better at 6 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HellaSwag, MGSM, MMLU, Winogrande). GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while GPT-4 is better at 6 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HellaSwag, MGSM, MMLU, Winogrande).

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jun 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Fri Jun 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while GPT-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 24 months newer than GPT-4.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

1.9yr newer
GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while GPT-4 has a cutoff of 2022-12-31.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4 (2022-12-31).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

1.5 yr newer
GPT-4

Dec 2022

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (75.0% vs 67.0%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (32,768 tokens)
Higher DROP score (80.9% vs 60.8%)
Higher GPQA score (35.7% vs 23.7%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.3% vs 78.6%)
Higher MGSM score (74.5% vs 60.7%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 64.9%)
Higher Winogrande score (87.5% vs 71.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
OpenAI
GPT-4

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or GPT-4?

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and GPT-4 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to GPT-4 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4 supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GPT-4?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons