Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova ProWhich is better in 2026?

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova Pro — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) and Nova Pro (by Amazon) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU). Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova Pro if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 6 months newer than Nova Pro.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

6mo newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Nova Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Pro's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Nova Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (94.8% vs 61.6%)
Higher DROP score (85.4% vs 60.8%)
Higher GPQA score (46.9% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 75.0%)
Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 64.9%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Nova Pro?

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Pro?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons