The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -5.0.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -5.0, ranking #273 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 7.8 and ranks #273 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.0
#344
7.8
#273
Reasoning
-5.8
#338
7.3
#271
Coding
0.0
#232
9.5
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Math
-0.9#293
16.7#194
Finance
-3.9#201
9.7#141
Legal
-3.9#187
9.5#129
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 18 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

8 shared

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 8 benchmarks (ARC-C, GPQA, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, Winogrande).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

30.6B diff

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 30.6B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 1601.6% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

8mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 7.8 to -5.0. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.0 vs 7.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons