Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Comparing Gemma 3n E4B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-06-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (32,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemma 3n E4B (Google) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.
Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.