Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Comparing Gemma 3n E4B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

15.6B diff

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has 15.6B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 195.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
23.6Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
23.6B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.

Gemma 3n E4B is 0 month newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

6d newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemma 3n E4B has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

8 mo newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Mistral AI
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B (Google) and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.