Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Nova Lite

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Lite is better at 2 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP).

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Lite specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Lite specifies output context (2,048 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B and Nova Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20.

Gemma 3n E4B is 7 months newer than Nova Lite.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer
Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Nova Lite's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Lite's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Nova Lite

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (92.4% vs 61.6%)
Higher DROP score (80.2% vs 60.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Amazon
Nova Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Nova Lite

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Nova Lite is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%.
Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Lite supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Nova Lite is developed by Amazon.