Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Comparing Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning has 6.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 75.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Gemma 3n E4B is 2 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Phi 4 Reasoning has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

9 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Microsoft
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Gemma 3n E4B (Google) and Phi 4 Reasoning (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.