Model Comparison
Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Claude Opus 4Which is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is 151.9x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Claude Opus 4 — which is better?
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (by Google) and Claude Opus 4 (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Claude Opus 4 is better at 1 benchmark (MMMLU). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, Gemma 4 26B-A4B is roughly 151.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemma 4 26B-A4B if…
- cost matters — it's about 151.9x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Claude Opus 4 if…
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output
| Feature |  |  |  |  |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Claude Opus 4.