The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 29.6.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 29.6, ranking #12 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 26B-A4B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.5 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
29.6
#115
51.5
#12
29.5
#110
51.2
#9
12.7
#91
37.1
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.13 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
Hy4 preview
25.0#107
40.2#14
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Gemma 4 26B-A4B · 32 for Hy4 preview

1 shared

Gemma 4 26B-A4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

744.8B diff

Hy4 preview has 744.8B more parameters than Gemma 4 26B-A4B, making it 2955.6% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
25.2Bparameters
Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
25.2B
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
770.0B
Hy4 preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 4 26B-A4B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Gemma 4 26B-A4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 26B-A4B was released on 2026-04-02, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 26B-A4B.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

5 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 26B-A4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 26B-A4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Jan 2025

Hy4 preview

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 29.6. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is made by Google and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 26B-A4B compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B scores AIME 2026: 88.3%, MMMLU: 86.3%, t2-bench: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 82.6%, MathVision: 82.4%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports 262K tokens and Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.6 vs 51.5), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B is developed by Google and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.