Model Comparison
Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-OmniWhich is better in 2026?
Comparing Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Omni across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Omni — which is better?
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (by Google) and MiMo-V2-Omni (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Gemma 4 26B-A4B is roughly 4.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemma 4 26B-A4B if…
- cost matters — it's about 4.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose MiMo-V2-Omni if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Omnidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemma 4 26B-A4B ($0.13/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemma 4 26B-A4B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Omni is more expensive than Gemma 4 26B-A4B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemma 4 26B-A4B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Omni's 262,000 tokens. Gemma 4 26B-A4B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
MiMo-V2-Omni
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 4 26B-A4B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2-Omni uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 4 26B-A4B was released on 2026-04-02, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.
Apr 2, 2026
3 months ago
2w newerMar 18, 2026
4 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 4 26B-A4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while MiMo-V2-Omni's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 4 26B-A4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Omni's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemma 4 26B-A4B is available from Novita. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
MiMo-V2-Omni
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Omni
View detailsXiaomi
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Omni.