The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 31B vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 33.4.

Google · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 33.4, ranking #12 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 31B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.13/M input and $0.38/M output

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.5 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
33.4
#92
51.5
#12
34.0
#84
51.2
#9
13.6
#84
37.1
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.13 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.38 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 4 31B
Hy4 preview
29.3#82
40.2#14
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Gemma 4 31B · 32 for Hy4 preview

1 shared

Gemma 4 31B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

739.3B diff

Hy4 preview has 739.3B more parameters than Gemma 4 31B, making it 2408.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 31B
30.7Bparameters
Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
30.7B
Gemma 4 31B
770.0B
Hy4 preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 4 31B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Gemma 4 31B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 31B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

Gemma 4 31B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 31B.

Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

5 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 31B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 31B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 31B

Jan 2025

Hy4 preview

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 31B
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 31B vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.5 to 33.4. Gemma 4 31B is made by Google and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 31B compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens and Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.4 vs 51.5), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview?

Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.