The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 31B vs Parse

Comparing Gemma 4 31B and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 4 31B and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Gemma 4 31B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 31B

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.13 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.38 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
8,192

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Gemma 4 31B · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 4 31B and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

28.4B diff

Gemma 4 31B has 28.4B more parameters than Parse, making it 1234.8% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 31B
30.7Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
30.7B
Gemma 4 31B
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemma 4 31B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only Gemma 4 31B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 31B and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 31B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 31B.

Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

6 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 31B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Parse's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 31B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Parse's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 31B

Jan 2025

Parse

Provider Availability

Gemma 4 31B is available from DeepInfra, FriendliAI, Novita, Together. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

Gemma 4 31B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.13/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.38/1M
friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.39/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.97/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 31B and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 31B
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 31B vs Parse.

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Parse?

Gemma 4 31B (Google) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 4 31B compare to Parse in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 31B and Parse?

Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 31B and Parse?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 8K), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Parse?

Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google and Parse is developed by Cohere.