The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 E2B vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 14.3 to 6.7.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.3 to 6.7, ranking #240 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.3 and ranks #240 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 E2B
Google
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.7
#294
14.3
#240
Reasoning
5.6
#295
11.6
#255
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 4 E2B
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Vision
0.7#179
10.5#121
Multimodal
2.9#146
11.6#111
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 4 E2B · 15 for Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

1 shared

Gemma 4 E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro).

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

68.3B diff

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct has 68.3B more parameters than Gemma 4 E2B, making it 1339.2% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 E2B
5.1Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
73.4Bparameters
5.1B
Gemma 4 E2B
73.4B
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 E2B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct was released on 2024-08-29.

Gemma 4 E2B is 19 months newer than Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Aug 29, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-06-30.

Gemma 4 E2B has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct (2023-06-30).

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

1.6 yr newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Jun 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E2B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E2B vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 14.3 to 6.7. Gemma 4 E2B is made by Google and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 E2B compare to Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%. Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.5%, VCR_en_easy: 91.9%, ChartQA: 88.3%, OCRBench: 87.7%, MMBench: 86.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.7 vs 14.3), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons