The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 E2B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 6.7.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 6.7, ranking #198 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.3 and ranks #198 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 E2B
Google
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.7
#294
20.3
#198
Reasoning
5.6
#295
19.2
#204
Agents
-3.6
#182
9.5
#125
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 4 E2B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Math
5.7#270
19.5#167
Vision
0.7#179
14.9#92
Multimodal
2.9#146
17.4#79
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 4 E2B · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

5 shared

Gemma 4 E2B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench v6), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MathVision, MMLU-Pro, MMMU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

27.9B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 27.9B more parameters than Gemma 4 E2B, making it 547.1% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 E2B
5.1Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
5.1B
Gemma 4 E2B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemma 4 E2B is 6 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

6mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E2B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E2B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 6.7. Gemma 4 E2B is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 E2B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.7 vs 20.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 E2B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons