The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 24.6.

Zhipu AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 24.6, ranking #5 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5-Air

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.6
#153
55.3
#5
Reasoning
24.0
#151
52.8
#7
Coding
11.6
#148
41.7
#10
Agents
6.1
#134
40.4
#4
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-4.5-Air
Muse Spark 1.3
Tool use
20.3#55
35.5#2
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for GLM-4.5-Air · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies output context (943,718 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.

Muse Spark 1.3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.5-Air

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.5-Air is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark 1.3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 13 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.5-Air
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, GLM-4.5-Air or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 24.6. GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.5-Air compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark 1.3?

GLM-4.5-Air supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.6 vs 55.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark 1.3?

GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons