The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs GLM-4.5-Air

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 24.6.

Google · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 24.6, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose GLM-4.5-Air

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
24.6
#153
Coding
35.6
#25
11.6
#148
Agents
31.2
#27
6.1
#134
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 14 for GLM-4.5-Air

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GLM-4.5-Airdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5-Air uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 13 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.1yr newer
GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GLM-4.5-Air side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
GLM-4.5-Air
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs GLM-4.5-Air.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or GLM-4.5-Air?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 24.6. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to GLM-4.5-Air in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GLM-4.5-Air?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 24.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GLM-4.5-Air?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons