Model Comparison
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
GLM-4.5-Air significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GLM-4.5-Air outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
GLM-4.5-Air significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
GLM-4.5-Air has 73.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct, making it 226.2% larger.
License
Usage and distribution terms
GLM-4.5-Air is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
GLM-4.5-Air is 10 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
Jul 28, 2025
8 months ago
10mo newerSep 19, 2024
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
GLM-4.5-Air
View detailsZhipu AI
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct