The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.5-Air vs Sarvam-105B

GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B are closely matched at 24.4 and 25.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Zhipu AI · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.4 and 25.7.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5-Air

  • you are already invested in the Zhipu AI ecosystem

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.4
#163
25.7
#153
23.8
#162
26.2
#148
11.4
#156
-1.6
#248
5.9
#142
5.5
#145
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 6
5 of 6
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
GLM-4.5-Air
Sarvam-105B
22.5#136
29.1#88
26.6#43
26.4#45
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for GLM-4.5-Air · 14 for Sarvam-105B

6 shared

GLM-4.5-Air outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-105B is better at 5 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MATH-500, MMLU-Pro).

Sarvam-105B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

GLM-4.5-Air has 1.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 1.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
106.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
106.0B
GLM-4.5-Air
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.5-Air is licensed under MIT, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-105B is 7 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.5-Air
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, GLM-4.5-Air or Sarvam-105B?

GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.4 and 25.7. GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.5-Air compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.4 vs 25.7), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.5-Air and Sarvam-105B?

GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.