Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Which is better in 2026?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Mistral Medium 3.5 (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5 is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Mistral Medium 3.5 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($1.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($7.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Mistral Medium 3.5 is more expensive than GLM-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jun 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
Input tokens$1.50
Output tokens$7.50
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

616.0B diff

GLM-5 has 616.0B more parameters than Mistral Medium 3.5, making it 481.3% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
128.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
128.0B
Mistral Medium 3.5

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Wed Jun 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Medium 3.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Mistral Medium 3.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Medium 3.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Medium 3.5 uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Mistral Medium 3.5

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Mistral Medium 3.5 was released on 2026-04-29.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is 3 months newer than GLM-5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

Mistral Medium 3.5

Apr 29, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Mistral Medium 3.5 is available from Mistral AI.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Mistral Medium 3.5

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $1.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 48.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 77.6%)
Mistral AI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to Mistral Medium 3.5 in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores COLLIE: 95.8%, Tau3 Telecom: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 86.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.6%, Tau3 Retail: 76.1%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM-5 is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Mistral Medium 3.5?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $1.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Mistral Medium 3.5 is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons