The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs GPT-4o

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT-4o is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose GPT-4o

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$2.50 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
128,000
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2024
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT-4o is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. GLM-5.3 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

GLM-5.3 is 25 months newer than GPT-4o.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.0yr newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
GPT-4o
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs GPT-4o.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or GPT-4o?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to GPT-4o in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than GPT-4o?

GLM-5.3 is 1.8x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $2.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.