The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs GPT-4o mini

Comparing GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Zhipu AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, GPT-4o mini is roughly 8.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • cost matters — it's about 8.2x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,000,000
128,000
Released
Aug 2026
Jul 2024
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 7.3x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. GLM-5.3 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

GLM-5.3 is 25 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.1yr newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while GLM-5.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5.3's cutoff date.

GLM-5.3

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
GPT-4o mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs GPT-4o mini.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or GPT-4o mini?

GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) and GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to GPT-4o mini in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is 9.3x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and GPT-4o mini?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.