The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs GPT OSS 120B

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 11.9x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 11.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose GPT OSS 120B

  • cost matters — it's about 11.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$0.45 / M
Context window
1,000,000
131,072
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2025
License
Unknown
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 15.6x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 9.8x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.45
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

636.2B diff

GLM-5.3 has 636.2B more parameters than GPT OSS 120B, making it 544.7% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
116.8Bparameters
753.0B
GLM-5.3
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

GLM-5.3 is 12 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

GPT OSS 120B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 120B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or GPT OSS 120B?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 15.6x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and GPT OSS 120B?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.09/M), licensing (Unknown vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and GPT OSS 120B?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI.