The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.6 vs LFM2.5-VL-3B

Comparing Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.6

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.6
xAI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
LFM Open License v1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.6 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.6
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM2.5-VL-3B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-08-12.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Grok 4.6

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.6 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.6's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date.

Grok 4.6

Feb 2026

LFM2.5-VL-3B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.6
✓ Preferred
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.6 vs LFM2.5-VL-3B.

Which is better, Grok 4.6 or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok 4.6 compare to LFM2.5-VL-3B in benchmarks?

Grok 4.6 scores CursorBench v3.2: 69.9%, DeepSWE 1.1: 65.9%, FrontierCode: 61.3%, AA-Index: 61.0%, GDPval-AA: 58.4%. LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

Grok 4.6 supports 500K tokens and LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.6 and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

Grok 4.6 is developed by xAI and LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons